🔗 Share this article

Russia's monetary authority has declared it is pursuing damages valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This action represents a direct warning by the Kremlin regarding proposals to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Financial Lawsuit

Based on reports in local news outlets, the central bank initiated a claim last week for approximately 18 trillion roubles. This sum is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials will decide later this week regarding a proposal to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian assets. This scheme entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its military and economic needs.

The vast majority of these funds, totaling €185 billion, are held at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. This institution acts as the main custodian for the Russian immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

EU authorities have maintained that their plan is on solid legal ground. Their position rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was frozen in European countries shortly after the 2022 military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any use of the funds as theft. It has threatened reciprocal actions, such as seizing European private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a prominent role in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan.

Strategic Positioning

With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev described the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. It has in the past noted it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Legal Hurdles Ahead

While courts in EU countries are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian tribunals, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities could try to implement a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such assets can be located," stated a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

European Safeguards

European authorities indicated they are working on steps to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. Additionally, they are designing protections to protect EU member states with assets in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the detailed scheme, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay unaffected.

Ukraine would solely be required to repay the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the immense damage caused during the ongoing conflict.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, backed by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an different method for funding Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unallocated funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, Kaja Kallas, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she stated. "Furthermore, it delivers a clear signal that when you cause all this damage to another country, you have to pay for the reparations."